In a democracy, people get
the government they deserve.
 

 – Adlai Stevenson

 

Dear World Watcher,

Like many people on September 11, 2001, I recorded several hours of television news coverage at home on my vcr. At 6:55am pacific time (9:55 eastern time), a few minutes before the first Twin Tower blew up, I began recording, flipping through the channels taping anything I thought was important.

While reviewing my 8 hours of tapes it became obvious that the videos of the planes crashing through the buildings are fake. The nose of the second plane comes out the other side of the city block-wide building and only then does it break apart. Also, the wing appears to rip through the side of the building like paper.

http://thewebfairy.com/911/missileout/index.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fae3DDYHiHA

At the end of this video CNN shows us a close-up view of the North Tower (building to the right) before it was blown up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWKIJhj0URM

Much of the plane's "entrance hole" is unbroken. Also some of the beams at the upper right are jutting outward.

Fake pictures on the internet and in television documentaries show a larger and more believable hole in the building. They even added some people standing in the hole!

For a very good view of what the North Tower really looked like before it was blown up go to http://wtc.vjs.org and click on "Tower 2 fireball". Also, at the tail end of that video clip you can see a helicopter or plane in the background. In none of the fake plane crash videos do we see a helicopter or plane there.

On YouTube you can find news clips of others who also saw no plane hit the South Tower:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3cpHxbIIV4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMi5tZfZ9Vk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7_U1h1kiwk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63BNIz8IIng

http://pumpitout.com/audio/dh_091908.mp3

Look closely at the corner of the South Tower as Flight 175 blasts out of the building. Notice the massive damage. http://thewebfairy.com/911/missileout/index.htm

That morning CNN showed us a close up view of the South Tower damage before the building was blown up (building to the left): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWKIJhj0URM

With the exception of one small gash, the corner of the building is intact and unbroken. How can this be?

Many of the witnesses interviewed throughout the day were actors, similar to Col. L. Fletcher Prouty's description in chapter 3 of his 1992 book JFK.

This person appears to miss his cue when upstaged by a passerby Fox News wasn't expecting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWKIJhj0URM

The actor (carrying a large bag) turns around and walks back towards the Trade Center, then comes back for his lengthy interview.

Other examples of fake witnesses:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72yx9lxUQNg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nVFWevtIyk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PTRsuRao7A

This obviously fake video clip of Flight 175 crashing into the South Tower was not aired until later in the evening: http://www.thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane/index.htm

...yet cameramen being chased by crumbling pieces of the Twin Towers had their footage aired within an hour or two.

Wide shots of the city shortly after the collapse of the South Tower. Did only one plane and one building really cause this amount of destruction to Manhattan?

Wide shots of the city shortly after the collapse of the North Tower. Did only two planes and two buildings cause all of this?

The words "pandemonium," "chaos," and "billows" are used profusely throughout the day by many of the news correspondents and witnesses. A witness who claimed to see the second plane crash into the South Tower describes: "Absolute pandemonium. . . I could see people running like ants." Could those words actually have some hidden meaning?
http://www.paradiselost.org/img/07-ma.html
http://www.mcgoodwin.net/pages/otherbooks/jm_paradiselost.html
http://www.literature.org/authors/milton-john/paradise-lost/
Plot Against The Peace

CNN's Judy Woodruff looks into the camera and says, "And Aaron this may be another point when we want to say God bless the souls of those who have lost their lives today, or who are dying. As we speak, in hospitals and in places where they cannot be reached, I think even those out there who may not believe that there is a god, at a time like this we all reach out for a higher being and we want to believe that there is someone who can bring us salvation."

We learn that that the Twin Towers were designed to withstand a direct impact of a 707 jet.

After 5pm many of the news stations began airing video clips of the 47-story WTC #7 collapsing. Nobody bothers to mention that this was obviously a controlled demolition; no apparent damage to the building as it falls like a house of cards.

At 11:07am (eastern time) CNN's Aaron Brown talks on the telephone with CNN's Alan Dodds Frank who is in lower Manhattan. Frank apparently reports that a third building collapsed at 10:45. He said it happened 15 minutes after the collapse of the North Tower (10:28) and a firefighter estimated 50 stories fell. When viewing this clip notice that Brown doesn't ask which building fell; why it fell; or, were there people in or around the building. When Frank is done with his report Brown casually moves on and changes the subject! Shortly after this conversation the clock underneath the CNN logo disappears and is never displayed again.

(One possible explanation for this mix-up is that the 47-story WTC #7 was scheduled to be blown up around the same time as the Twin Towers, but for some reason they postponed it to later in the day. Poor Mr. Frank wasn't informed of this last minute change of plan and he went on to read his well-rehearsed script at the wrong time.)

News coverage of the Flight 93 "crash site" at Shanksville, Pennsylvania shows nothing but a ditch, smoke, and some broken trees.

Fox News reporter Jeff Goldblatt interviews a photographer, live, at the Shanksville. The photographer says all he could see was a 10ft. x 15-20ft. ditch and some broken trees. "Nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there."

Early footage of the Pentagon before the wall and roof collapsed. Firemen hose down the fire that can be seen inside the building through the windows. One guy with a broom is sweeping. (Where is the plane?)

KTVU Channel 2 (local Oakland, Calif. station) correspondent Mike Majchrowitz reports live from the Pentagon. He says that a little after 10am the smoke seemed to be going down and then there was a set of explosions and it turned black again. He also says he hasn't yet seen an eyewitness to the crash.

C-span interviews a Pentagon employee in her car. She says, "The building shook. I was in the building and that last bomb threat [sic] they just had, it shook the building. I left."

CNN's Jamie McIntyre reports live from the Pentagon. He says there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon; no large sections of wing, tail, or fuselage visible.

Clear views of the front of the Pentagon show a clean green lawn with no craters, skid marks, or plane wreckage. Many tall street lamps can be seen all over the place that don't appear to be broken or bent.

Even though there is a freeway in plain view of the Pentagon explosion, in all my news footage from that day the only witnesses who claimed to see a plane crash were from over-the-phone reporters quoting nameless, faceless people – with one exception: CNN interviewed USA Today reporter Mike Walter at the scene who said he was in his car stuck in traffic when he saw a plane fly by low and crash into the side of the building. He says parts of the plane are on the overpass. He also says, "And the toughest thing for me right now is I've got a 14 year-old daughter, and a lot of her friends have parents who work in the Pentagon. And I just talked to her on the phone and those kids are going through agony; they don't know if they're okay. So it's tough. I mean this really hits home." He shows signs of starting to cry.

Also, the sentence from Walter's story "I mean it was like a cruise missile with wings went right there and slammed right into the Pentagon" is excerpted and included, out of context, in the video "9/11 - In Plane Site" to help substantiate the theory that a missile (or "bunker buster") flew into the building. That's not really what he said.

(Just between you and me, I don't believe a plane, missile, helicopter, or UFO from the planet Krypton slammed into the Pentagon. I think old-fashioned bombs did it. This idea of a missile or "a hole in the Pentagon" is reminiscent of what Jim Garrison refers to as a "false sponsor" in his book On the Trail of the Assassins.)

From a helicopter ABC News shows us the onlookers on the nearby overpass.

The initial report of hijackers with knives and box-cutters on Flight 77 allegedly came from Barbara Olson using a phone on the plane. She just happened to be married to Solicitor General Ted Olson who argued President Bush's election case before the Florida State Supreme Court in 2000. What a small world.

(Why would they use knives and boxcutters anyway? Plastic guns would be much easier to smuggle onto planes and far more effective in a hi-jacking.)

If four Boeings had actually crashed, there would be many videos (news and amateur) of the tons of wreckage scattered around, and they would be the most viewed videos on youtube and the rest of the internet. But there is zero. And how do the terrorists in the news media and on the internet explain this? They don't. They run.

Also missing from the news coverage of that day is any mention of an approaching second plane by the news commentators and reporters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7_U1h1kiwk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMi5tZfZ9Vk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cvWwIxMbmE

How did it happen that an entire country could be tricked into believing something so dumb that a 7-year-old kid can figure it out? William Shirer wrote about this sort of thing in "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich." He described what it was like being in Nazi Germany, and no matter how silly or retarded the Nazi news propaganda was, the gullible German public swallowed it up hook, line, and sinker. (As Will Rogers once said: "All I know is what I read in the newspaper.")

Shirer wrote:

    I myself was to experience how easily one is taken in by a lying and censored press and radio in a totalitarian state. Though unlike most Germans I had daily access to foreign newspapers, especially those of London, Paris and Zurich, which arrived the day after publication, and though I listened regularly to the BBC and other foreign broadcasts, my job necessitated the spending of many hours a day in combing the German press, checking the German radio, conferring with Nazi officials and going to party meetings. It was surprising and sometimes consternating to find that notwithstanding the opportunities I had to learn the facts and despite one's inherent distrust of what one learned from Nazi sources, a steady diet over the years of falsifications and distortions made a certain impression on one's mind and often misled it. No one who has not lived for years in a totalitarian land can possibly conceive how difficult it is to escape the dread consequences of a regime's calculated and incessant propaganda. Often in a German home or office or sometimes in a casual conversation with a stranger in a restaurant, a beer hall, a cafe, I would meet with the most outlandish assertions from seemingly educated and intelligent persons. It was obvious that they were parroting some piece of nonsense they had heard on the radio or read in the newspapers. Sometimes one was tempted to say as much, but on such occasions one was met with such a stare of incredulity, such a shock of silence, as if one had blasphemed the Almighty, that one realized how useless it was even to try to make contact with a mind which had become warped and for whom the facts of life had become what Hitler and Goebbels, with their cynical disregard for truth, said they were.

One tactic to keep people in the dark and spinning their wheels is to play both sides of the fence. Not only is the official lie propagated by the terrorists who carried out the crime, but they also have people supplying the "alternative" information to the small percentage of the population who suspect something isn't right. Notice how many people in the 9/11/01 "Truth Movement" will say that George Bush was behind the attacks, or explosives brought down the Twin Towers, yet in the same breath will also say that two Boeings crashed into the buildings, the videos are real, and there were no fake witnesses in the Trade Center that day. This is very effective! Most Americans just can't see through it. Mae Brussell talked about these kinds of plants in her broadcast of November 15, 1976 (#243), and also in the KKUP interview with Tom Davis, part 4 of 9. http://www.maebrussell.com/Audio/Merrill%20College%20Lecture.html

For many years Mae Brussell exposed just how and why the traditional domestic U.S. eastern establishment powers, such as the Rockefellers and Kennedys, are being wiped out by the more sadistic, foreign interests infiltrating the United States (essentially the same people we were fighting during WWII). And on September 11, 2001 the Rockefeller-built World Trade Center was blown up littered with jokes and comedy acts for anybody who bothers to look. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXcQWaTRPbQ

For those interested in understanding what led up to this I would recommend the following books:

If you have trouble finding the books try www.addall.com or www.ebay.com. (Also on ebay people occasionally sell 9/11/01 television coverage they recorded that day.)

Good luck,

Tim Canale

 

Home